Max Pastukhov

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Open democracy
  • Pussy riot
  • Abramovich
  • Vladimir Putin
  • Money Management

Max Pastukhov

Header Banner

Max Pastukhov

  • Home
  • Open democracy
  • Pussy riot
  • Abramovich
  • Vladimir Putin
  • Money Management
Vladimir Putin
Home›Vladimir Putin›Is Russian President Vladimir Putin creating a pretext for war?

Is Russian President Vladimir Putin creating a pretext for war?

By Larry Bowman
February 17, 2022
0
0

Take the situation in Donbass, the eastern Ukrainian territories partially controlled by Russian-backed separatists. During a press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Tuesday, Putin dropped the “g” word to describe the situation there.

“According to our estimates, what is happening today in Donbass is genocide,” Putin said.

Scholz pushed back, later telling reporters that Putin was “wrong” to use the term. But those comments were already in the public domain – and Putin had stepped up the rhetoric.

Putin’s grievance in the Donbass is not new. He has spoken repeatedly about what he describes as the violation of the rights of ethnic Russians and Russian speakers in Ukraine, and said it was within Russia‘s right to intervene militarily to protect them.

But Putin appears to be arguing for his own version of a ‘responsibility to protect’, however far the situation in the Donbass may be from a Rwanda – where more than 800,000 people, mostly Tutsis, have been killed. in 100 days to 1994 – or Srebrenica – where more than 7,000 mostly Muslim men and boys were massacred in 1995.

The invocation of genocide echoes Russia’s false claim that its neighbor Georgia committed genocide against civilians in the breakaway republic of South Ossetia in August 2008. During this brief conflict, the Russia has launched a massive military incursion that has driven deep into Georgian territory, a scenario that worries the West. decision-makers today with regard to Ukraine.

The Investigative Committee, Russia’s top law enforcement body, took Putin’s comments one step further on Wednesday when it announced that it had opened a criminal investigation into alleged evidence of this which she called “indiscriminate shelling” of civilians in the Donbas region by Ukrainian forces since 2014.

In a press release laced with politically charged language, the Investigative Committee said it had opened a criminal case under Part 1 of Article 356 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which covers ill-treatment inflicted on the civilian population and the use of prohibited means and methods. by an international treaty in an armed conflict.

The statement of the investigative committee echoes Putin’s speech on the genocide, saying: “The intention to exterminate the inhabitants of Donbass is obvious – the Russian investigation recorded hundreds of such facts which are considered as evidence of the use of prohibited means and methods of warfare”.

The reason the Kremlin wants to change the subject is clear: in 2015, for example, bombings blamed on Russian-backed Donbas separatists claimed the lives of at least 30 people in the southeastern city of Mariupol. from Ukraine.

Since the start of the conflict in Donbass in 2014, thousands of civilians have been killed and injured in the fighting, according to United Nations estimates. But announcing an investigation – not by an independent body, and at the height of a confrontation with Ukraine – appears to be a clearly political decision, regardless of the veracity of the allegations.

And then there is also the thorny question of the legal status of the separatist regions of Donbass. Russia has never recognized the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR) in the Donbass as sovereign and independent states, although it has issued Russian passports to people who live there.

Earlier this week, Russian lawmakers called on the Russian president to recognize the breakaway Donbas republics as independent. This, too, creates a potential situation where Russia could declare the need to respond to Ukrainian “aggression” against these small states.

Would that happen? Recognition of the DNR and LNR would effectively frustrate the Minsk Accords, a set of measures which for now, according to the Kremlin, is the only way to resolve the Ukrainian crisis.

But fabricating more trouble can also benefit the Kremlin: it expands the menu of options available to Putin.

Related posts:

  1. Russia’s northernmost base projects power into the Arctic
  2. Putin is ready to “decarbonize Europe”. With Arctic LNG
  3. US Cold War adviser asks ‘gentleman’ Vladimir Putin for Russian citizenship
  4. US-Russian standoff looms as top diplomats meet in Iceland

Categories

  • Abramovich
  • Money Management
  • Open democracy
  • Pussy riot
  • Vladimir Putin

Recent Posts

  • In the world’s largest democracy, believers are not free
  • Vladimir Putin ready for ‘mass mobilization’ of troops for Ukraine as Russian funeral bills rise
  • US investor’s purchase of Chelsea soccer club from Putin associate Abramovich intrigues Wall Street
  • Reclaiming Democracy – The American Perspective
  • Ukraine LIVE: Putin activates ’50 sleeper agents’ to launch attacks on UK infrastructure | World | New
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions